Dostoevsky and Parricide ()1 The moralist in Dostoevsky is the most readily assailable. It is reprinted in Freud’s Gesammelte Schriften, XII, 7– Dostoevsky and Parricide has 69 ratings and 7 reviews. Adriana said: Freud, assim não dá para te defender. Quando Freud encasqueta em analisar o autor e . indicates briefly the content of “Dostoevsky and Parricide” and mentions Theodor Reik’s criticism, also Freud’s answer to Reik. Mark Kanzer calls the essay a.

Author: Mukree Kajilkis
Country: Guyana
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 21 March 2010
Pages: 346
PDF File Size: 15.48 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.35 Mb
ISBN: 623-8-33774-192-7
Downloads: 93368
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mikashakar

Refresh and try again. After graduating, he worked at the Vienna General Hospital Dr. Member feedback about Martha Bernays: Dmitrii Karamazov feared that he would not be able to control himself in Siberia if the guards treated him roughly p. His argument seems to be irrefutable and his critics must be reduced to parricidd silence.

These two genetic factors would have provided the basis for organic epilepsy. The work is based partly on new material that has become available since the publication of Ernest Jones’ The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud Paperback34 pages.

PEP Web – Dostoevsky and Parricide ()

Member feedback about Dostoevsky and Parricide: The two audacious rebels are W. What is the evidence? The fredu century concept of frequent and inevitable intellectual deterioration has rightly been laid to rest, but it is not possible at this point in time to replace it with a well-founded twentieth-century concept. The creative artist is the least doubtful: Yet the defense lawyer Fetyukovich declares that Smerdyakov believed himself to be the illegitimate son of Fyodor Pavlovich: Jung later broke with Freud and developed qnd own theories.


See his book Dostoevsky: This led the authors of the Bologna report to suggest that “the pesonality and the fantastic world of the patient may certainly deeply affect the ‘ecstatic experience’ during seizures.

But the situation is far from satisfactory.

As Freud explained it: The attack came from two directions: For the record, there are two brave epilepsy experts who can envisage the reverse process of psychogenic epilepsy: We have now established that his employment of palliative measures and his hostility toward the repressions of civilization each contribute to the development of his theory and his decision to commit his crime. Let us begin with a short summary of the novel:.

Dostoevsky and Parricide

That same day, she wrote in her letter, she had visited Anna Grigorevna and asked whether Dostoevsky had ever told her the cause of his first epileptic seizure. Dostoevsky’s epilepsy seems to belong to the second category: The nature of this anguish, in his own words, was that he felt he was some kind of criminal; it seemed to him that he was weighed upon by mysterious guilt, by a great crime.

Confused agitation [ smutno ], depression [ grustno ], pangs of conscience [ ugryzeniia ], and sense of unreality [ fantastichno ]. The reader is referred not only to Strakhov’s account given above but to the detailed records of seizures made by Dostoevsky himself between andwhich are available in Parrricide.


He engages in these palliative measures for the same reasons as everybody else does, yet is unable to achieve the same results due to the abnormal strength of his instincts. From an entirely different point of view the analysis of Kramskoi’s painting “Contemplative” James Rice reinforces Peace’s thesis about the importance of the Castrate theme.

On the other hand, each of his novels could be regarded as a rebellion or a need to rebel against an authority figures, whether that figure is the personal father, the state, or God.

He admits that his diagnosis of hysteria could not be proved due to a lack of information on Dostoevsky’s first seizures nor was there enough information about the relation of the seizures to his life. After graduating, he worked at the Vienna General Hospital. Although his biography has retained its status as a classic, Jones has been criticized for presenting an overly favorable image of Freud. Grigory, fully realizing the challenge to his and God’s authority, has no answer except the time-honored prerogative of fathers: We have detailed portraits of his parents; we learn of his traumatic birth; we know exactly when and how his first seizure originated.